Skip to main content

"Greenpeace Faces Trial in $300 Million Lawsuit That Could Lead to Bankruptcy"


Greenpeace is set to go on trial on Monday before a North Dakota jury in a high-stakes lawsuit that could potentially bankrupt the organization.


The lawsuit was filed in 2017 by Dallas-based company Energy Transfer, which accused Greenpeace of orchestrating disruptive protests against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation nearly a decade ago.


Activists argue that the lawsuit is an attempt to suppress free speech and set a dangerous precedent for protest groups, asserting that Greenpeace only played a supporting role in demonstrations led by Native Americans.


“This trial is a critical test of the future of the First Amendment, both freedom of speech and peaceful protest under the Trump administration and beyond,” said Greenpeace’s interim director, Sushma Raman, in public remarks on Thursday.


Energy Transfer declined to comment ahead of the trial. However, in a statement released in August, the company stated that the lawsuit against Greenpeace “is not about free speech as they are trying to claim. It is about them not following the law.”

The trial, set to take place at the state court in Mandan, N.D., is expected to last five weeks. Many observers doubt that Greenpeace, one of the world’s most well-known environmental activist groups, will be able to sway a jury in conservative North Dakota.


Greenpeace said the lawsuit seeks $300 million in damages—more than 10 times its annual budget. Two affiliated entities are also named as defendants: the Greenpeace Fund, a Washington-based group that provides grants to other organizations, and Greenpeace International, based in the Netherlands.


The Dakota Access Pipeline was approved in 2016, prompting widespread protests from Native American groups, who argued it would threaten sacred land and the local water supply. The 1,170-mile pipeline, which transports oil from North Dakota to Illinois, became a flashpoint for environmental and indigenous rights activists.


Thousands of protesters gathered near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, forming an encampment that lasted for months. Tribal leaders sued to halt the pipeline’s construction, rallying behind the slogan “Water Is Life.” Clashes between protesters and law enforcement were frequent, with Energy Transfer alleging that key equipment was damaged and its financial backing suffered as a result.


Activist Waniya Locke, a Standing Rock resident, emphasized the grassroots nature of the movement and the role of women in leading it. “We stood on the river banks unarmed,” she said.


Though the encampment was eventually dismantled, the pipeline remains operational, though final approvals are still pending.


President Trump’s former interior secretary pick, Doug Burgum, served as North Dakota’s governor until last year. Meanwhile, Kelcy Warren, founder and executive chairman of Energy Transfer LP, is a Trump supporter and a major political donor.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Child Dies in Texas Measles Outbreak as Washington Officials Urge Vaccinations

  WASHINGTON STATE — A child has died amid a measles outbreak in Texas and New Mexico, marking the first measles-related death in the U.S. in a decade, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In response, health officials in Washington state are urging residents to stay vigilant and ensure vaccinations are up to date as concerns grow over the potential spread of the disease. Dr. James Lewis, a health officer with the Snohomish County Health Department, stated, “We have not seen an uptick yet in Washington, but it’s certainly possible that we could end up seeing an increase in cases, just as some places in the country have.” The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) reported six confirmed measles cases in 2024, with none reported so far this year. However, Dr. Lewis noted that there have already been two confirmed measles exposures in the state in 2025. "None of those exposures resulted in illness, likely due to prior immunity," he said. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Set to Rule in Favor of Straight Woman in Discrimination Case

  The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in an employment discrimination case brought by a straight woman who was twice passed over for positions in favor of gay colleagues. The case follows the court’s 2023 decision to strike down race-conscious college admissions and comes amid the Trump administration’s push to dismantle diversity-focused policies. While some conservative groups had hoped for a broad ruling on workplace diversity initiatives, the justices appeared poised to issue a narrow decision, affirming that anti-discrimination laws apply equally to all employees. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch noted the unusual agreement among justices and lawyers from both sides, acknowledging that the lower appeals court erred by imposing stricter requirements on majority-group plaintiffs proving workplace discrimination. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh suggested the ruling could be short and unanimous, simply stating that discrimination based on sexual orientation—whether against gay or straig...
Post a Comment
Read more